HOME PAGE
FIRM OVERVIEW
BIOGRAPHIES
WHAT'S NEW?

 

HEALTH PLANS & HMO's
PHYSICIANS
E-HEALTH COMPANIES
INSURANCE COMPANIES

 

SEMINARS
PUBLICATIONS
PUBLISHED APPELLATE DECISIONS
SITE SEARCH

 

OFFICE LOCATION
QUESTIONS & COMMENTS

MEDICARE APPEALS PROCEDURE

Physicians who care for Medicare patients occasionally find that their claims for payment are either denied after submission, or may be subject to a pre-payment review of a significant number of claims, by the local insurer contracted to process Medicare claims. In Northern California, the National Heritage Insurance Company is the insurer contracted by the federal government to process Medicare claims.

A physician who seeks to appeal a Medicare claims denial can seek an informal review or inquiry with the insurer over the telephone. If this is unsuccessful, the physician can obtain a formal review of the denial by the insurer over the telephone or in writing. A physician who seeks to appeal a formal review decision by the insurer can obtain a Medicare fair hearing with a hearing officer.

1. Review by Telephone of Denied Claims

After a Medicare claim has been denied, the physician can call the insurer on the telephone seeking a formal review of the denial. The physician should be prepared to provide his or her provider identification number, the patient’s name and Medicare number, and the date of service at issue. Claims for up to three patients at a time can be reviewed over the telephone. The request for review over the telephone should be made within six months of the claim denial.

Certain claim denials can be subject to review over the telephone, such as denials for claims lacking certain information or containing incorrect information. This includes denials for incomplete or inadequate dates of service, diagnosis or procedure codes, modifiers, profiles, billed amounts, or quantities billed. Claims improperly bundled, misread, or erroneously denied as duplicate can also be reviewed over the telephone.

No written decisions by the insurer are made for reviews requested over the telephone.

In Northern California, the Provider Help Line is (530) 743-1587 for reviews of denied claims over the telephone.

2. Review in Writing of Denied Claims

If the insurer continues to deny the claim even after a telephone review, or if the physician seeks review of claim denials involving more than three patients, the physician must write the insurer to seek a written review of the claim. Claim denials involving ambulances, eligibility, claims deemed too old, deductibles, missing operative reports, test results, or invoices, or overutilization of services requiring documentation of medical necessity, should be reviewed in writing. The written request for review must be made within six months of the denial. Unprocessable claims cannot be reviewed and should be re-submitted through the normal claims processing procedure.

The physician seeking a review of denied claim in writing should include a thorough cover letter specifically identifying the basis for the review and including any relevant information to assist the insurer in processing the claim.

In cases where the insurer has provided the physician with the necessary guidance after the filing of a written request for review, the physician should wait at least forty five days before re-submitting the claim. If a simple correction or addition to the claim is all that is needed, the claim may be re-submitted as a new claim. However, re-submission as a new claim does not extend the six month deadline for reviews of denied claims.

In Northern California, written Medicare claim denial reviews should be addressed to Medicare Claims Review, Chico, California 95976.

3. Medicare Fair Hearing for Denied Claims

Many physicians find that claim denial reviews either by telephone or in writing by the insurer are generally ineffective and are useful only for obvious processing errors by the insurer or the physician. In such cases, the physician’s only recourse is to seek a Medicare fair hearing. Medicare fair hearings can be done over the telephone, in writing, or in person at a hearing. The hearings are conducted and decided by a Medicare fair hearing officer. Telephonic hearings are done over the telephone at a time mutually convenient to the hearing officer and the physician. Written hearings are done solely through the use of letters and documents.

Physicians considering telephonic or written hearings should consider retaining an attorney to assist in presenting the appeal. Attorneys can assist the physician in preparing the appeal, either by preparing the physician to make the presentation over the telephone, appearing for the physician over the telephone, or preparing the written documentation for the hearing. Attorneys should submit an Appointment of Representative form from the insurer to represent a physician at a hearing. Physicians interested in retaining counsel should seek legal representation experienced in Medicare appeals. Some professional liability insurers may provide legal representation for Medicare appeals.

Physicians seeking an appeal through a fair hearing should strongly consider having the hearing occur in-person. Physicians should also strongly consider retaining legal counsel to represent them at the hearing. An in-person hearing gives the physician the best chance to personally persuade a fair hearing officer to order payment of denied claims. An in-person hearing allows the physician to personally testify as to why the claims should be paid. An attorney can help the physician present the best case possible before the hearing officer. The insurer will be represented by an employee of the insurer and/or the insurer’s physician advisor, but is typically not represented by counsel.

Any relevant documentation that supports payment of the claim should be presented at the hearing. This can include operative reports, office or progress notes, and treatment plans.

A request for a Medicare fair hearing must involve a claim or an amount in controversy for more than $100, an unsuccessful review of the claim by the insurer, and be in writing. The request should be limited to claims involving twenty patients. The request must state that the physician is dissatisfied with the outcome of the review, and that a review is being requested. The request should also include a copy of the claim denial and a copy of the denial of the review by the insurer. The request should include the patient’s name and Medicare number, date of service, and procedure code. The request must be made within six months of the rejection of the review of the denied claim by the insurer.

In-person hearing can occur at a geographic location convenient to the physician because there are Medicare fair hearing officers located throughout the state. Decisions by hearing officers are not precedent. A hearing can be scheduled within two weeks of the receipt of the letter from the hearing officer acknowledging the request for a hearing.

In Northern California, Medicare fair hearings should be sent to Medicare Part B Hearings, P.O. Box 2807, Chico, California 95927-2807.

Physicians have reported good results in Medicare fair hearings and are generally more successful than with reviews by insurers.

If the amount in controversy is greater than $50,000, a physician can request a hearing before a Social Security Administration administrative law judge if the physician is unsuccessful at a Medicare fair hearing. However, administrative law judges are known to generally favor the government at administrative law hearings and are not necessarily experienced in dealing with Medicare claims. Physicians seeking relief at administrative law hearings should seek legal counsel experienced in conducting discovery and appearing at administrative law hearings.

An unsatisfactory outcome at an administrative law hearing can be dealt with within sixty days through an appeal for amounts greater than $500. The Medicare Appeals Council in the Social Security Administration can hear your appeal without regard to the decision by the administrative law judge. Physicians can also appeal decisions by the Appeals Council involving more than $1000 by filing suit against the insurer in federal district court.

 

Copyright © 1997-2004.
Pacific West Law Group LLP

Website Disclaimer & Credits