HOME PAGE
FIRM OVERVIEW
BIOGRAPHIES
WHAT'S NEW?

 

HEALTH PLANS & HMO's
PHYSICIANS
E-HEALTH COMPANIES
INSURANCE COMPANIES

 

SEMINARS
PUBLICATIONS
PUBLISHED APPELLATE DECISIONS
SITE SEARCH

 

OFFICE LOCATION
QUESTIONS & COMMENTS

TREATING PHYSICIANS MUST BE DISCLOSED AS EXPERTS
KALABA V. GRAY

In Kalaba v. Gray (2002) 02 CDOS 1309, a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case stated in her statutorily-required disclosure of expert witnesses that she reserved her right to call her treating physicians as expert witnesses. Shortly before trial, plaintiff informed the physician’s attorney that she intended to call three of her treating physicians as witnesses and ask them for their expert opinions, despite the fact that her treating physicians had not agreed to testify and had not been retained by her to be experts.

The court held that a party subject to a statutory demand for expert witnesses, must disclose the names of any treating physicians it wishes to call to elicit expert opinions, but is not required to submit a statutory expert witness declaration about the treating physicians. Failure to disclose the names and addresses of the treating physicians acts as a bar to any questions designed to elicit expert opinions.


 


Copyright © 1997-2004.
Pacific West Law Group LLP

Website Disclaimer & Credits