HOME PAGE
FIRM OVERVIEW
BIOGRAPHIES
WHAT'S NEW?

 

HEALTH PLANS & HMO's
PHYSICIANS
E-HEALTH COMPANIES
INSURANCE COMPANIES

 

SEMINARS
PUBLICATIONS
PUBLISHED APPELLATE DECISIONS
SITE SEARCH

 

OFFICE LOCATION
QUESTIONS & COMMENTS

WHAT MANAGED CARE PLANS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT LAWSUITS
(CONTINUED)

6. SUMMARY OF CLAIMS HISTORY

Because a significant number of claims may be involved in the litigation, the retrieval and storage of copies of the claims, the forms used to inform the patient about the benefits provided, and the benefits checks may be insufficient to properly identify all of the issues present in the litigation.

A chart identifying each claim in chronological order, the date of service, the type of service provided, the name of the provider, the billed amount, the allowed amount, the amount in benefits paid, the amount paid by the patient, the amount denied by the plan, and the reason the benefits were denied, should be created and provided to counsel at the earliest opportunity.

7. LEGAL AND FACTUAL ANALYSIS BY COUNSEL

Plans should expect their counsel to provide an initial analysis of the facts of the case, the relevant legal and factual issues involved, and a description of the efforts needed to defend the plan in the lawsuit. Plans may ask their counsel for a litigation budget, or estimate of the costs of defending the plan from the lawsuit.

Plans are entitled to itemized monthly invoices of legal services and costs provided. Plans should be prepared to directly pay for costs forwarded to the plan for payment.

Plans must expect their counsel to retain consultants who may provide expert testimony on medical and managed care issues. Plans can assist their counsel by recommending the names of potential expert witnesses who can testify regarding various factual issues in the case. Plans should be warned that retaining consultants can be an expensive proposition.

8. PRE-TRIAL DISCOVERY

As the litigation commences, legal counsel will want to interview those individuals who may be potential witnesses in the lawsuit.

Answers to interrogatory questions propounded by the opposing party concerning the plan and the issues in the lawsuit may need to be answered by the plan. Such answers will need to be verified in writing as being true and correct by a responsible employee of the plan.

Employees of the plan may be asked to give a deposition. Counsel will prepare those individuals for deposition a week or two before the deposition by explaining what happens in a deposition, and by discussing the case and the witness’ involvement in the facts of the case. One of the primary purposes of the meeting is to fully discuss the facts of the case so that every answer given in the deposition has already been discussed between the witness and the attorney. The meeting should occur shortly before the deposition for the witnesses benefits, but should not occur too soon before the deposition in the event additional research by the plan or its attorneys needs to be accomplished before the deposition takes place.

Parties to a lawsuit have the right to a jury trial in state court. Plans should expect, and indeed, welcome, the opportunity to defend themselves before juries except in specific limited situations.

When the case is being scheduled for trial, employees who are potential witnesses should advise counsel of any scheduling conflicts such as multi-day vacations or conferences that would seriously impair the ability of counsel to present those witnesses to the jury.

9. SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS

The court may require the parties to engage in informal or formal settlement negotiations. Plans should expect their counsel to fully and objectively advise them as to the strengths and weaknesses of their defense, as well as the anticipated costs of defense.

An honest evaluation of the witnesses for the plan as well as the opposing party should be provided by counsel since the subjective impressions left by witnesses are one of the most critical pieces of evidence considered by juries.

The plan may be required to attend a settlement conference in court. Individuals with full authority to settle cases for the plan are required to attend. Attendance at settlement conferences only by individuals with limited settlement authority is highly discouraged.

10. THE TRIAL DATE

If a case is to be tried, employees of the plan may be asked to testify. Because the availability of a courtroom on the day scheduled for trial cannot be predicted in advance, the trial may not proceed for several days if at all. Often, the absence of an available courtroom because of the high volume of cases being handled by the courts results in a continuance of the trial. Accordingly, witnesses for the plan need flexibility in their professional responsibilities for scheduling purposes.

11. MEDIA COVERAGE

A strategy for dealing with media inquiries needs to be created early in the litigation in the event the issues in the lawsuit are deemed newsworthy. Plans should strongly consider working with the media to inform the public and potential jurors of the advantages of managed care.

12. CONCLUSION

Managed care plans need to expend sufficient time and resources into defending themselves in litigation. They need to retain attorneys who are experienced in both health insurance coverage litigation as well as medical malpractice defense, and have actual jury trial experience. By presenting a well-considered and coordinated defense with legal counsel, managed care plans can maximize their chances of a successful disposition of the lawsuit.

 

Page 1 | 2

 

Copyright © 1997-2004.
Pacific West Law Group LLP

Website Disclaimer & Credits